Ruck v. Caledonia Silver Mining Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCooper, P. J.
This action was brought to recover of defendant corporation five hundred shares of its capital stock, or in case a recovery cannot be had, for the value thereof. Findings were filed, upon which judgment was entered for plaintiff. This appeal is from the judgment, on the judgment-roll alone.
The findings show that at all the times mentioned in the complaint the plaintiff was the owner of said five hundred shares of capital stock; that at a meeting of the directors of defendant corporation held on June 5, 1902, the following resolution or order, levying an assessment, was passed, to wit:
“Resolved…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hughes v. Antietam Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
- San Bernardino Investment Co. v. MerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Raht v. Sevier Mining & Milling Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1898
- Westcott v. the Minnesota Mining CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Morris v. Metalline Land Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cheney v. CanfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Stivers v. Sidney Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1949
- American Well & Prospecting Co. v. BlakemoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Raisch v. M. K. & T. Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1908
- Brown v. St. Paul Consolidated Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.