Campodonico v. Santa Maria Bean & Grain Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, P. J.
The plaintiff in this action was the holder of a mortgage on a growing crop of oats which was the property of the mortgagor, one Sutton. While the latter was engaged in threshing the oats, on his own land, it was agreed between him and plaintiff that he, Sutton, would convey the threshed grain to a certain warehouse and would there store it in plaintiff’s name. Sutton hauled the grain to the warehouse, but stored it in his own name, that is, he took warehouse receipts showing a storage by himself instead of by plaintiff. Later he sold and conveyed the oats to defendant by indorsing to it the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bank of Woodland v. DuncanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Chittenden v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Crosby v. Fresno Fruit Growers' Co.California Court of Appeal · 1916
- Horgan v. ZanettaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Byrnes v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- I. S. Chapman & Co. v. UleryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Bell v. Central Bank of Imperial ValleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Pacific Fruit Exchange v. F. E. Booth Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930