Horgan v. Zanetta
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Benito County and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
In 1893 James Murphy was the lessee of a parcel of inclosed land called field No. 1. D. W. Cole owned adjoining land called field No. 2. Murphy had executed a chattel mortgage of the crop of grain growing on his said leased land to the plaintiff, *29Horgan, to secure eight hundred dollars. In July Murphy commenced harvesting the crop and hauling it away from the land on which it had grown onto the said land of Cole, and finished doing so in the early part of August. On September 1st Cole brought suit against Murphy and attached the grain. Jensen and Lauritzen also brought suit against Murphy,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Goodyear v. WillistonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Waterman v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bastanchury v. Times-Mirror Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Brande v. Babcock Hardware Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1907
- Ramsey v. California Packing Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1921
- Valley Bank v. Hillside Packing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Campodonico v. Santa Maria Bean & Grain Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.