Pacific Fruit Exchange v. F. E. Booth Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKoford, P. J.
Plaintiff holds a crop mortgage on the crops of the seasons of 1925 to 1932, inclusive, grown on the ranch of W. J. Smith and wife in Sacramento County. In 1927 defendant, in consideration of money previously advanced, purchased and received from said Smith a part of the pear crop grown on said ranch that year. By this action plaintiff recovered judgment against defendant for the value of the said mortgaged pears after deducting the share-tenant’s part for maturing the same. Defendant appeals.
The complaint was in three counts. The first sets forth the facts in detail, stating a cause of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dodge v. MeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Corey v. StruveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Lehmann v. SchmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Bank of Woodland v. DuncanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Chittenden v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- I. S. Chapman & Co. v. UleryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Sandhu v. MainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950