Bank of Woodland v. Duncan
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County and from an order denying a new trial. W. H. Grant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Britt, C.
Replevin for four hundred and fifty sacks of wheat, part of the crop grown during the cropping season of 1892-93 by J. R. and B. F. Davisson on certain large tracts of land farmed by them as copartners in Yolo county. Said copartners made two negotiable promissory notes in favor of one Wolf Levy, the first dated November 9, 1892, for the sum of $4500, and the second dated April 5,1893, for $2958.78, each payable with interest one month from its date, and each secured by a separate mortgage executed by the Davissons upon their said crop growing and to be grown. It was provided in each…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Front Street, Mission & Ocean Railroad v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- McArthur v. MageeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Holly v. HeiskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Deacon v. BlodgetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Glass v. Basin & Bay State Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
- Flinn v. FerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co. v. PerrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Consolidated Irrigation District v. CrawshawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- First National Bank v. SteersIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.