Crosby v. Fresno Fruit Growers' Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresnp County, and from an order denying a new trial. H. Z. Austin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
On September 30, 1912, A. H. Weyant, according to the allegations of the complaint, was indebted to A. C. Crosby, the plaintiff, in the sum of one thousand dollars, evidenced by promissory notes secured by a mortgage on a certain crop of grapes in Fresno County, which mortgage was duly recorded. On the seventeenth day of April, 1913, Weyant entered into a consignment contract in writing, by the terms of which he “assigned, transferred, and agreed to deliver” to the defendant this crop of grapes. Under said contract the defendant was to pack and sell the grapes through the California Fruit…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mulcahy v. BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Hewel v. HoginCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Mendocino County v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- Humphreys v. McCallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Le Breton v. Stanley Contracting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Oliver v. the Swiss Club TellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Brown v. PepperdineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Burrow v. CarleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- East Central Fruit Growers Production Credit Ass'n v. ZuritskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- I. S. Chapman & Co. v. UleryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.