Legal Opinion

Terry v. Terry

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 18, 2000No. A083746; No. A083772PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REARDON, J.

Three times the trial court has ruled on the matter of spousal support in this case. Each time the supported spouse’s estate has grown and the supporting spouse’s income has diminished. Yet, on this last go-around, with the supported spouse enjoying an investment portfolio of nearly $3.75 million, retirement benefits approaching $1 million and real estate valued at $773,500, the trial court refused to invoke its independent *925authority under Family Code1 section 4322 to terminate support. We reverse the order diminishing, but continuing spousal support, and concurrently affirm…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crocker National Bank v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. In Re Marriage of StephensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. In Re Marriage of BidermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. In Re Marriage of McNaughtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Dallman v. DallmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of DuncanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. In Re Marriage of DietzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. In Re Marriage of BowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. In Re Marriage of TydlaskaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Marriage of Cappello CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API