Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Tydlaska
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 19, 2003No. D041180PublishedCited by 10 opinions
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HUFFMAN, J.
Lee Tydlaska (Lee) appeals an order denying his request to modify spousal and child support obligations to his former spouse Darlene Tydlaska (Darlene). He contends: (1) the court erred by finding he did not file a current income and expense declaration; (2) the court should have given him an opportunity to file an updated income and expense declaration; (3) Darlene failed to timely file her income and expense declaration; and (4) the court erred by ignoring the special master’s report. We affirm the order.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Lee and Darlene dissolved their 27-year…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Marriage of KuppingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- In Re Marriage of StephensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Terry v. TerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Laube v. LaubeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
3Cited by10 opinions
- Khera v. SameerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Ciprari v. Ciprari (In re Ciprari), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Marriage of Baysinger CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Marriage of Cappello CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Marriage of CiprariCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.