International Harvester Credit Corp. v. Valdez
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtMunson, J.
—International Harvester Credit Corporation (International) appeals a summary judgment in favor of Santiago Valdez. The sole issue is whether the holder of a security interest in a motor vehicle is barred from bringing suit against a tortfeasor, who had destroyed the secured vehicle, after the tortfeasor's settlement with the registered owner. We answer in the affirmative.
In 1980, David Valle purchased a used truck tractor and potato bed for $14,375.84. He made a substantial down payment and received a trade-in allowance; the remainder of the purchase price was financed by the seller, who…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Stotts v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
- Commercial Securities, Inc. v. MastOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Nationwide Ins. Co. v. BANK OF FOREST, ETC.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1979
- Muscatel v. StoreyWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Miller v. Hortman-Salmen Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Chrysler Credit Corp. v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- State Automobile Mutual Insurance Co. v. Chrysler Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1990
- Stevensen v. GoodsonUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- McCullough v. Goodrich & Pennington Mortgage Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- Scholfield Bros. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.