Legal Opinion

Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Smith

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 24, 1994No. 558PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The is.sue in this appeal is whether an automobile insurer, before paying a fire loss, must conduct a search of public records in order to avoid liability to a lienholder who has not been named as a loss-payee in the policy and whose interest has not otherwise been disclosed to the insurer. The trial court held that the insurer had a duty to search the public records before paying a routine loss, and entered summary judgment in favor of the lienholder and against the insurer. After careful review, we reverse.

On November 11, 1985, Harry G. Smith and Kathy Alexander, t/a Republic…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Musser v. Vilsmeier Auction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Stevenson v. Economy Bank of AmbridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Denlinger, Inc. v. DendlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Ppg Industries, Inc. v. The Hartford Fire Insurance Company, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  5. Bank of Landisburg v. BurrussSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh Construction Co. v. GriffithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Mariner Chestnut Partners, L.P. Ex Rel. Lamm v. LenfestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. GMAC Inc. v. Coley (In Re Coley)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. First v. Zem Zem Temple, A.A.O.N.M.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Interbusiness Bank v. First Nat. Bank of Mifflin.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2004

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API