Legal Opinion
Miller v. Hortman-Salmen Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 30, 1933No. 14336PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
This is an action by a mortgagé creditor against the defendant as a tort-feasor to recover the sum of $300 for having demolished a Pontiac sedan automobile, upon which the plaintiff held a chattel mortgage. The damage is alleged to have resulted from a collision between the Pontiac automobile and a l%-ton’ White lumber truck of the defendant on the Gentilly road on December 21, 1929, at 6:30 p. m. The petition alleges that the plaintiff is the holder and owner of a certain matured note secured by a chattel mortgage on the Pontiac sedan, on which there is a balance of $289.25, with 8 per cent,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Delano v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Harris v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Harris v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Dorsey v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
- Smith v. GuffordSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commercial Securities, Inc. v. MastOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- International Harvester Credit Corp. v. ValdezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- Lake City Auto Finance Co. v. WaldronSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. TrappSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
- Richland Parish Hosp. Service Dist. v. Hanover Ins. CompaniesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.