Legal Opinion

Scholfield Bros. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 25, 1988No. 60,838PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland, J.:

This action raises some first impression questions concerning the liability of a third-party tortfeasor’s insurance carrier to the party holding a security interest in the vehicle damaged after the insurance carrier has settled with the owner-operator of the vehicle. The district court held in favor of the secured party and the insurance carrier appeals from this judgment.

The facts may be summarized as follows. On July 30, 1986, an automobile owned and driven by Marie Parrish collided with an automobile owned and driven by Florence L.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Emigh v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  2. Newell v. KrauseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  3. Nelson v. Hy-Grade Construction & Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  4. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Atchison County Auction Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1985
  5. Newell v. BrollierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Chrysler Credit Corp. v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. State Automobile Mutual Insurance Co. v. Chrysler Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1990
  3. Stevensen v. GoodsonUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Isaac v. CrichlowSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
  5. Doll v. Chicago Title InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API