Stotts v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Smith, J., entered November 16, 1915, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for damages.
1Opinion of the Court
Chadwick, J. —
Plaintiff sues as the owner of an automobile truck which was damaged in a collision with one of defendant’s street cars. The jury found that the accident resulted in consequence of the negligence of the driver of the street car. The verdict is sustained by ample testimony.
The first question to be decided is whether plaintiff has a cause of action. -He had bargained for the truck, made some payments, and had given his notes for the balance due. The truck was delivered to him under a conditional sales contract. Plaintiff had possession, under the terms of the contract, at the time…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Winton Motor Carriage Co. v. Broadway Automobile Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- Duteau v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
- Messenger v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Peterson v. ChessWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- French v. OsmerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Associates Discount Corp. v. GillineauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Lawson v. HelmichWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- Cross v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Criez v. Sunset Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
- Munz v. National Bond Investment CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.