Legal Opinion
Bell & Zajicek, Inc. v. Heyward-Robinson Co.
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided February 27, 1962No. File 126778PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKlau, J.
The defendant National Surety Corporation demurs to the first count of the plaintiff’s substituted complaint on the ground that the count fails to state a cause of action against it for the reason that the mechanics’ liens for which its bond was substituted are invalid, not having been sworn to as required by § 49-34 of the General Statutes.
The mechanics’ liens as set forth in the first count of the substituted complaint are alleged to have been duly signed and sworn to and filed with the town clerk of the town of Hartford. Pursuant to a motion for oyer, copies of the mechanics’ liens were…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Stone v. RosenfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Dalbey Bros. Lumber Co. v. CrispinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- Morehouse v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Pierce, Butler & Pierce Manufacturing Corp. v. EndersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- City Lumber Co. of Bridgeport, Inc. v. BorsukSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Crescent Electric Supply Co. v. NerisonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Crockett v. SampsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Kellner v. ChristianWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- J. C. Penney Properties, Inc. v. Peter M. Santella Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- H.A.M.S. Co. v. Electrical Contractors of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.