H.A.M.S. Co. v. Electrical Contractors of Alaska, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINO WITZ, Justice.
This appeal concerns a judgment which was entered by the superior court foreclosing mechanics and materialmen’s liens against real property. Here and below appellants have challenged the validity of the lien claims on the ground the lien claims were not verified by oath as required by AS 34.35.070(c)(5).1 We reverse the judgment of the superior court.2
Appellants contracted with a general contractor, Irvin and Co., for the repair and improvement of the H.A.M.S. building which was located in Anchorage. Irvin and Co. in turn entered into contracts with several…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Osborn v. City of WhittierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Christman v. SalwayOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Etheredge v. BradleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Ex parte FinnOregon Supreme Court · 1898
- Anderson v. Chambliss Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Stone-Krete Construction, Inc. v. EderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Kellner v. ChristianWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Projects Unlimited, Inc. v. Copper State Thrift & Loan Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
- Kiehne v. AtwoodNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- Nerox Power Systems, Inc. v. M-B Contracting Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.