Legal Opinion

Anflick v. Gruhler

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 11, 1946No. Appeal, 154PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Patterson,

Charles .Anflick, appellant, instituted, this action in assumpsit against Jacob Gruhler and Erich Muller, individually, and as copartners, trading as Gem Manufacturing Company,, appellee, to recover-profits alleged to be due from appellee on twelve.separate oral contracts of sale.. The trial judge granted appellee’s motion for a compulsory nonsuit for the reasons, (1) there was a variance between the allegata and the .probata, and (2) appellant-was barred from recovery by reason, of section 4 of the Sales Act. This appeal is from the refusal of the court en…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Knox v. SimmermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Bowman v. Gum, IncorporatedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Aland v. P-G Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Pierson v. LondonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. National Bank v. Lake Erie Asphalt Block Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fallaro v. YeagerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. In the Interest of M.B.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Anderson v. Murdoch Storage & Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Stewart v. ScharffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Allegheny Ludlum Industries, Inc. v. CPM Engineers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API