Legal Opinion

Pierson v. London

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 10, 1930No. Appeal 283PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

This is an action of trespass brought by Patrick Pierson, aged four years, by his father and next friend, Thomas A. Pierson, and by the parents of the said Patrick Pierson in their own right, to recover damages resulting from personal injuries sustained by Patrick Pierson. The statement of claim averred, inter alia, that on June 8, 1927, the minor plaintiff and another child, Rhuehanna Gray, aged fourteen years, went to defendant’s store and purchased a torpedo about three quarters of an inch in diameter, which contained a dynamite cap and small pebbles; that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kehres v. StuempfleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. McMillen v. SteeleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Stegmaier v. Keystone Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. National Bank v. Lake Erie Asphalt Block Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  5. Shaffer v. MowerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kuhns v. BruggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Holt v. PariserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Mautino v. Piercedale Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Smith v. ALLEGHENY COUNTYSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Bonet v. Municipio de BarcelonetaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API