Legal Opinion

In the Interest of M.B.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 25, 1986No. 01503PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This appeal is from an order declaring appellant’s child to be a dependent child and permitting the child to remain in the custody of his parents subject to certain conditions and limitations. Appellant argues that the trial court erred in adjudicating his son a dependent child under the Juvenile Act when a petition under that Act was never filed. 1 We agree and, accordingly, reverse.

Facts and Procedural History

Appellant’s four and one-half year old son was examined by a Dr. Stillman as a result of a two-inch diameter bruise on the child’s right buttock. A caseworker for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Computer Print Systems, Inc. v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Smith v. ALLEGHENY COUNTYSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Anflick v. GruhlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In re BosleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Fallaro v. YeagerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. J.F. v. D.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Patterson v. Armstrong County Children and Youth ServicesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Stamus v. DutcavichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API