Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Scharff

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 21, 1955No. Appeal, No. 162PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

We are here concerned with a trespass action resulting from a collision between automobiles of Clyde F. Stewart and Fred A. Scharff. After verdicts for the plaintiffs, Stewart and his wife, the lower Court refused defendant Scharff’s motion for judgment n.o.v. and ordered a new trial. Scharff has appealed from the refusal of his motion, contending that there was a fatal variance between the allegata and the probata.

The complaint makes inter alia the following averments : “Third: On or about the 12th day of February, 1950, wife plaintiff was operating her automobile in a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Cox v. Wilkes-Barre Railway Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Kehres v. StuempfleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Kirshon, Et Ux. v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Osborne v. Victor Dairies, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Emert v. Larami Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Schuylkill Haven Borough v. BoltonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Sfakianakis v. SfakianakisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Soley v. Nelson, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API