Legal Opinion

Huber v. Scott

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 2, 1932No. Docket No. 4491PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (R. L.), J.

The plaintiff procured a judgment for $5,000 against the defendants for damages sustained in an automobile casualty. The cause was tried with a jury. This appeal was taken from the judgment and order denying a motion for new trial.

The Golden State highway runs southeasterly from Modesto to Merced. The paved portion of this highway is fifteen feet in width with a macadam strip of two and a half feet and an additional oiled gravel shoulder of four feet in width on either side. The entire right of way is sixty feet in width. Adjoining this highway on the easterly side thereof…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bryant v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Pope v. HalpernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Benjamin v. NoonanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Curran v. Earle C. Anthony, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. Williamson v. FitzgeraldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Campagna v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Cooley v. BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Clark v. JanssCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Hilton v. HymersNevada Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Page v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API