Legal Opinion

Clark v. Janss

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 18, 1940No. Civ. No. 2474PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

The plaintiffs were injured in a collision between an automobile in which they were riding, and which was driven by Marie Clark, and another car owned by the defendant. In this action for damages the court found that the collision occurred as a result of negligence on the part of the defendant and contributory negligence on the part of Marie Clark. From a judgment for $1139.50 in favor of the plaintiff Marjorie Clark, the defendant has appealed.

*525The sole ground of appeal is that, as a matter of law, the negligence of Marie Clark must be imputed to Marjorie Clark since the undisputed evidence…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kelley v. Hodge Transportation SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Pope v. HalpernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Peccolo v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Collins v. GravesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Wessling v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Jeffries-Eaves, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Shook v. BealsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Shook v. BealsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Sortino v. LoneoakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Du Bois Brewing Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API