Legal Opinion

Cooley v. Baker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 8, 1950No. 102PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtErvin, J.

This appeal raises the question whether the complaint affirmatively alleges facts showing actionable negligence on the part of the defendant Baker.

When the complaint is stripped of its legal conclusions, it becomes evident that the plaintiff relies upon the following factual averments to establish liability on the part of Baker:

Immediately before the accident Baker was driving his Ford truck southward on his right-hand half of South Church Street, and Bizzell was operating his Pontiac Sedan northward along his right-hand side of the same thoroughfare. Baker turned his Ford truck to the left…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Conley Ex Rel. Conley v. Pearce-Young-Angel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Morris v. Dame'sSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  3. Smith v. ClarkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  4. Holland v. . StraderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Newbern v. . LearySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Matheny v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Tart v. RegisterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Barnhart v. AhlersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Badders v. LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Hawes v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API