Legal Opinion

Pope v. Halpern

California Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1924No. S. F. No. 10187PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an appeal under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure from a judgment following a verdict in favor of plaintiff. for $2,044.50 as damages for the death of his minor son, which resulted from a collision between an automobile driven by defendant and a motorcycle driven by one Clarence Gams, upon which the decedent was riding as a guest.

In arriving at their verdict for the plaintiff the jury thereby resolved in his favor any conflict in the evidence, so that the facts disclosed by the record may, for the purposes of the appeal, be stated as follows: The plaintiff’s son, Miles,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bryant v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Bresee v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Nonn v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Lynn v. GoodwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Sime v. MaloufCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Flores v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Kelley v. Hodge Transportation SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Bloom v. Leech, Admr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API