Smith v. Physicians Health Plan, Inc
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrickley, J.
This case presents the question whether MCL 500.3109a; MSA 24.13109a)1 requires health insurers whose policies contain coordination of benefits clauses to reimburse an insured for medical expenses paid by an automobile no-fault insurer under a policy in which the insured elected uncoordinated medical coverage. We find no intent by the Legislature when it mandated that no-fault carriers make available coordinated coverage at a reduced cost to correspondingly prohibit health insurers from including coordination of benefits clauses in the coverage provided by the health insurance policy. We…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Raska v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Group Insurance v. CzopekMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Federal Kemper Insurance v. Health Insurance Administration, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
- LeBlanc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Jarosz v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- UAW-GM Human Resource Center v. KSL Recreation Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Oakland County Board v. Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Shanafelt v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- Dunn v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Bombalski v. Auto Club InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.