Legal Opinion

Smith v. Physicians Health Plan, Inc

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1994No. 95960, (Calendar No. 14)PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrickley, J.

This case presents the question whether MCL 500.3109a; MSA 24.13109a)1 requires health insurers whose policies contain coordination of benefits clauses to reimburse an insured for medical expenses paid by an automobile no-fault insurer under a policy in which the insured elected uncoordinated medical coverage. We find no intent by the Legislature when it mandated that no-fault carriers make available coordinated coverage at a reduced cost to correspondingly prohibit health insurers from including coordination of benefits clauses in the coverage provided by the health insurance policy. We…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Raska v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Group Insurance v. CzopekMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Federal Kemper Insurance v. Health Insurance Administration, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  4. LeBlanc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Jarosz v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. UAW-GM Human Resource Center v. KSL Recreation Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Oakland County Board v. Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Shanafelt v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Dunn v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Bombalski v. Auto Club InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API