Legal Opinion

LeBlanc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1981No. 62439, (Calendar No. 10)PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, C.J.

Section 3109(1)1 of the Michigan no-fault insurance act2 requires a subtraction of benefits provided under the laws of state or federal government from the amount of personal protection insurance benefits payable under any no-fault insurance policy. A second provision of the no-fault act, § 3109a,3 permits a coordination of no-fault personal protection benefits with "other health and accident coverage on the insured”. The principal question presented in this case is whether Medicare payments, made on behalf of a qualifying participant to cover expenses incurred as a consequence of an accident…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Mathews v. DiazSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Advisory Opinion Re Constitutionality of 1972 PA 294Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
  3. O'Donnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Workman v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Magreta v. Ambassador Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Michigan Catastrophic Claims Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Federal Kemper Insurance v. Health Insurance Administration, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Jarosz v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Department of Social Services v. American Commercial Liability InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Northern Group Services, Inc. v. Auto Owners Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API