Newhall v. Hunsaker
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was brought under section 347 of the Civil Code to recover twenty-five shares of the Tulare County Power Company, which were sold for a delinquent assessment. The stock was sold for $225, and the corporation, instead of requiring that the assessment be paid in money, accepted the promissory note of the bidder for the amount of the bid. The assessment sale was made and the note received on the 27th of March, 1915, and the note was paid the following August. Plaintiff did not question the validity of the sale until September 15th, and she did not learn before that time of the manner…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hayward v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Pacific Trust Co. v. DorseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Quartz Glass & Manufacturing Co. v. JoyceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Sayre v. Citizens' Gas Light & Heat Co.California Supreme Court · 1886
- Ruck v. Caledonia Silver Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brown v. St. Paul Consolidated Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929