Sayre v. Citizens' Gas Light & Heat Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Ross in Department One.
1Opinion of the CourtMyrick, J.
JAn opinion was filed by the court, in Department, June 23, 1885. After hearing by the court in Bank, we are satisfied of the correctness of the views expressed in that opinion. As to other points presented, but not referred to in the opinion, we will say we see no error. The court below was correct in its views that the act of March 26, 1866, authorized an assessment on full-paid stock.
The contract between Morris, the assignor of the plaintiff, and the Citizens’ Gas Light and Heat Company, did not call for unassessable stock, even if it should be conceded that under the laws of this state a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Hayward v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
3Cited by9 opinions
- Townsend v. CowlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
- Richman v. Bank of PerrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Alexander v. BosworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Joseph v. DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Hatch v. Lucky Bill Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.