Legal Opinion

Brown v. St. Paul Consolidated Oil Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 17, 1929No. Docket No. 6878PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, J., pro tem.

Plaintiffs, as stockholders of the defendant corporation, sought an adjudication that an assessment levied upon their stock and a subsequent sale of such stock for nonpayment of that assessment were void. The court found that the assessment was valid; that, while there were irregularities in the proceedings leading up to the sale, yet plaintiffs were not entitled to relief because of noncompliance with the provisions of section 347 of the Civil Code, and that plaintiffs’ laches barred their recovery. Upon this appeal from the judgment based on those findings, plaintiffs urge…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. San Bernardino Investment Co. v. MerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Lawrence v. Premier Indemnity Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Thompson v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Herbert Kraft Co. Bank v. Bank of OrlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Cheney v. CanfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stivers v. Sidney Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Castello v. Central Eureka Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API