Grant v. Los Angeles & Pacific Railway
California Supreme Court
Appeals from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County fixing the compensation of a receiver, and from an order denying an application to vacate an order of substitution. Lucien Shaw, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.
The record embraces appeals from two orders of the superior court—the first an order fixing the compensation of one Silver as receiver in the action, and the other an order denying an application of the appellant, Grant, to vacate a former order sub*72stituting him as plaintiff in the action in place of the California Bank, the original party plaintiff.
Respondents object that the orders are not appealable, and that both appeals should be dismissed, and ask that such disposition be made.
As to the order of substitution, this objection is well taken. The statute gives no appeal from such an order,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Grant v. Superior Court of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Smith v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Welsh v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Smith v. Los Angeles & Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by24 opinions
- Sjoberg v. HastorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Title Ins. Trust Co. v. Calif. Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Efron v. KalmanovitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Bennett v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Sullivan v. GageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.