Legal Opinion

Smith v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

California Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1893No. 15106PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Hearing in the. Supreme Court upon a writ of certiorari to annul an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County appointing a receiver. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.

It appears from the return to the writ of certiorari issued herein that the superior court of Los Angeles, on September 30, 1889, made an order appointing one Silver receiver for the Los Angeles and Pacific Railway Company. The order was made in an action then pending in that court, wherein the California Bank, a corporation, was plaintiff, and the Los Angeles and Pacific Railway Company and others were defendants. The petitioner here claims that the order appointing the receiver was in excess of the jurisdiction of the superior court, and the object of this proceeding is to procure the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. La Société Française D'Epargnes et de Prévoyance Mutuelle v. Dist. Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Dist.California Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Reynolds v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Keys v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Elliott v. Superior Court of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1914
  2. A. G. Col Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Grant v. Los Angeles & Pacific RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Security-First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Bryant v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API