Legal Opinion

Smith v. Los Angeles & Pacific Railroad

California Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1893No. 19,252PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from Superior Court, Los Angeles County; J. W. McKinley, Judge. Action by Smith against the Los Angeles and Pacific Railroad Company. An application for an order directing the sheriff to levy on sufficient property of defendant to satisfy a judgment theretofore obtained by plaintiff against defendant was denied and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.

A receiver was appointed in the case of California Bank v. Los Angeles & Pacific R. R. Co. on September 13, 1889. On October 26, 1891, plaintiff herein filed a petition of intervention in that action, setting forth, among other things, that he had obtained a judgment against defendant herein for the sum of $4,403.30 on October 2, 1891, and that no part thereof had been paid. He prayed that his claim *238might be allowed against the corporation defendant, and that certain land belonging to the latter be sold and the proceeds of the sale be applied to the payment of the debts of the corporation in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Elliott v. Superior Court of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Grant v. Los Angeles & Pacific RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Lewis v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. Finerty v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API