Legal Opinion
McFadden v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 12, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-0940PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Corey McFadden, proceeding pro se, brings this action against his employer, the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”), and three WMATA employees, Lisa Cooper Lucas, Ron A. Kelley, and John Coleman (the “individual defendants”), asserting claims for disability discrimination, retaliation, and defamation. See Complaint (“Compl.”) ¶¶ 79-119. Currently before the Court is the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss in Part. 1 Upon careful consideration of the parties’ submissions, 2 the Court concludes for the following reasons…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Associated Producers, Ltd. v. Vanderbilt UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Bey v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- McFadden v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Wood v. American Federation of Government EmployeesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.