Legal Opinion
Bey v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided October 11, 2018No. Civil Action No. 14-1115 (RBW)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge *6The plaintiff, Corey LeRoy Bey, proceeding pro se, filed this civil suit against the defendants, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority ("WMATA"), Amalgamated Transit Union Local 689 (the "Union"), and various individuals employed by both WMATA and the Union. See Second Amended Complaint ("Bey II Compl.") ¶¶ 13-23, ECF No. 81. The plaintiff asserts violations of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 701 (2012) ; the American with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12102(2)(B) (2012) ; the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1977, 1988…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Beraki v. Crescent Hotels and Resorts Employer of Employees at Ven Embassy Row HotelDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Crawford v. SessionsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Herzfeld v. BarmadaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- In Re: Polar Bear Endangered Species Act Listing and 4(d) Rule Litigation - Mdl 1993District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Institute for Energy Research v. Department of the TreasuryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.