Legal Opinion
McFadden v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 7, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2014-1115PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge
This civil suit is currently before the Court on several motions: (1) the Plaintiffs Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Appeal (“Stay Mot.”); (2) the Plaintiffs Motion for the Honorable Court to Amend [Its April 23, 2015] Order (“Amend Mot.”); (3) the Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (“Leave Mot.”); and (4) the Plaintiffs Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (“J. Mot.”). After careful consideration of the parties’ submissions, 1 and for the reasons that follow, the Court will deny the motion to stay…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lamb v. Millennium Challenge CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Bey v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Senatore v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- McFadden v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Tillmon v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.