Legal Opinion

Associated Producers, Ltd. v. Vanderbilt University

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 23, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2014-0397PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Associated Producers, LTD, and Simcha Jacobovici (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), filed suit against Vanderbilt University (“Vanderbilt”) and Robin M. Jensen (“Jensen”) for Intentional Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage and Business Relations. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants intentionally interfered with Plaintiffs’ contract with National Geographic to produce an “archeological film concerning the burial cave in Jerusalem” (“the documentary”). Presently before the Court are Defendant Vanderbilt’s and Defendant…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hourani v. Psybersolutions LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  2. Katopothis v. Windsor Mount Joy Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  3. United Therapeutics Corporation v. Vanderbilt UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  4. Barcroft v. GibbsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  5. Gregorio v. GordonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API