People v. Semaan
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
Penal Code section 186.11, 1 sometimes called the
“Freeze and Seize Law,” 2 permits the superior court in certain white-collar criminal cases to take possession of assets under the defendants’ control and to preserve them for the payment of restitution. A person who claims an interest in frozen assets may seek their release by filing a verified claim with the superior court. (§ 186.11, subd. (e)(6).) In this case, the superior court denied a claim filed by the person whose name appeared on a frozen bank account controlled by defendants, finding the claimant failed to show…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bowers v. BernardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Crocker National Bank v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Weiner v. FleischmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. Superior Court (Jones)California Supreme Court · 1998
- Olson v. OlsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Meoli v. Huntington National Bank (In Re Teleservices Group, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2012
- Coyne v. De Leo, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. MozesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Marr. of ValliCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- (PC) Pangborn v. CDCRDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.