Legal Opinion
Integrated Lender Servs., Inc. v. Cnty. of L. A.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided April 27, 2018No. B281135PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUBIN, ACTING P. J.
*869When a trustee sold at foreclosure property once owned by a convicted fraudster, there were surplus proceeds. Following statutory procedures ( Civ. Code, § 2924j ), the trustee deposited the surplus funds with the trial court for determination of the proper distribution. There were two claims to the funds: (1) the County of Los Angeles, which had been awarded criminal restitution against the fraudster, and claimed the right to collect the restitution from the property by means of a lis pendens and temporary restraining order recorded in the criminal prosecution; and (2)…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thompson v. AsimosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Slintak v. Buckeye Retirement Co., LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- People v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- McManus v. KPAL Broadcasting Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. McGurkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Homeward Opportunities Fund I Trust 2019-2 v. TaptelisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- MTC Financial Inc. v. Cal. Dept. of Tax and Fee Admin.California Court of Appeal · 2019
- People v. Gates CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. ShahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Quality Loan Service Corp. v. The Bank of New York Mellon CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2020