State v. Vanden-Busch
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, P. J.
Defendant appeals the trial court’s judgment finding him in contempt for failure to pay child support and imposing 60 months of bench probation. He contends that the trial court erred in finding him in contempt and that the court “plainly erred when it imposed a determinate term of probation on the basis of proceedings that were not conducted as provided in the punitive contempt statute.” We reject defendant’s contention that the trial court erred in holding him in contempt, but agree that the court committed plain error in imposing a determinate term of probation.1 Accordingly, we reverse…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Mikkelsen v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Fry v. FryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Wolf v. WolfCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- In re the Marriage of MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Zamora-SkaarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- Lamm v. LammCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Braatz v. BraatzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019