Legal Opinion

State v. Austin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 2, 2016No. 130267C; A157364PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevore, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment that found her in contempt and imposed punitive sanctions of one year of bench probation and a $500 fine. Defendant argues that the trial court plainly erred by imposing those punitive sanctions in a contempt proceeding for remedial sanctions. See Altenhofen and Vanden-Busch, 271 Or App 57, 62, 349 P3d 655 (2015) (reversing, as plain error, the trial court’s imposition of a punitive sanction where the state conceded that “there is no dispute that the proceeding below was initiated as a proceeding for the imposition of remedial sanctions”). We agree with defendant,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of DahlemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. Vanden-BuschCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. In re the Marriage of MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. Lamm v. LammCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API