Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Miller

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 1, 2006No. 020224; A126305PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Husband appeals from a supplemental judgment holding him in contempt for failing to comply with his obligations under the general judgment dissolving his marriage. He concedes that he was in contempt, but contends that the trial court erred in confining him for 10 days because confinement for a definite period of time is not an available sanction for remedial contempt. We agree and reverse and remand.

Following husband’s failure to comply with the terms of the dissolution judgment, wife filed a motion to hold husband in remedial contempt. One of the remedial sanctions wife sought was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stevens v. CzerniakOregon Supreme Court · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Vanden-BuschCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. State v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API