Legal Opinion

State v. Gardner

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 2, 2017No. 15CN01221; A160457PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals a judgment of contempt that ordered him to pay delinquent child support and placed him on probation for a determinate period of one year. He argues that the trial court failed to follow the procedure required by ORS 33.055 (2015) to impose remedial sanctions for contempt, and that the court erred by imposing punitive contempt sanctions in a remedial contempt proceeding.

In relevant part, ORS 33.055 (2015) provides:

“(1) Except as otherwise provided in ORS 161.685,[1] proceedings to impose remedial sanctions for contempt shall be conducted as provided in this section.

⅜ * ⅜ *

“(3)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. Vanden-BuschCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. In re the Marriage of MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. State v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lamm v. LammCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. Braatz v. BraatzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API