Legal Opinion

Barwick v. . Barwick

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 29, 1947PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

The sole question presented on this appeal is whether or not the plaintiff has' alleged sufficient facts, and with the particularity required by our decisions, to support a verdict for the relief sought. Lawrence v. Lawrence, 226 N. C., 624, 39 S. E. (2d), 807; Brooks v. Brooks, 226 N. C., 280, 37 S. E. (2d), 909; Blanchard v. Blanchard, 226 N. C., 152, 36 S. E. (2d), 919; Pearce v. Pearce, 225 N. C., 571, 35 S. E. (2d), 636; Howell v. Howell, 223 N. C., 62, 25 S. E. (2d), 169; Pollard v. Pollard, 221 N. C., 46, 19 S. E. (2d), 1; Carnes v. Carnes, 204 N. C., 636, 169 S. E., 222; McManus v.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McManus v. . McManusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  2. Dowdy v. . DowdySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Augir v. WarderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Brooks v. . BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. Carnes v. . CarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hall v. MabeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Motley v. MotleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Vandiver v. VandiverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Hall v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Nall v. . NallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API