Legal Opinion

Motley v. Motley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1961No. 593PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

The defendant does not except to or assign as error the order of the court below overruling the demurrer to the plaintiff’s first cause of action, or to the allowance of plaintiff’s motion to strike the plea in bar set out in the defendant’s further answer and defense. He appeals only from the order making the allowances hereinabove set out.

In the hearing below the defendant introduced in evidence the ante-nuptial contract dated 24 September 1956, and relies thereon as a release and a bar to the right of plaintiff to have the court award her attorneys’ fees and alimony pendente lite, citing…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. French v. McAnarneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Ritchie v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Ritchie v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. McManus v. . McManusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Bailey v. Bailey.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Posner v. PosnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  2. Belcher v. BelcherSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  3. Eubanks v. EubanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Osborne v. OsborneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  5. In Re Marriage of HiggasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API