Legal Opinion

Nall v. . Nall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1948PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

The plaintiff husband instituted his suit for divorce a vin-culo on the ground of two years separation. G.S. 50-6. The defendant wife filed a cross-action for divorce a mensa on allegations in her answer of abandonment, and cruel treatment which endangered her life, and of such indignities offered to her person as to render her condition intolerable and life burdensome. G.S. 50-7. The facts upon wffiich her cross-action was based were set forth at length. She alleged the separation was without fault on her part, and that solely because of his treatment of her she was forced to leave him 26…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rader v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. McCune v. Rhodes-Rhyne Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Craver v. . SpaughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. Query v. Gate City Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Hennis v. . HennisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Larsen v. SedberryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Norman v. NormanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Streeter v. StreeterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Malinak v. MalinakCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API