Legal Opinion

Hall v. Hall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 1959No. 377PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The findings of fact were sufficient to support the ■award of alimony pendente lite and counsel fees. Furthermore, in our opinion, the facts found were supported by competent evidence.

The contention of the defendant that the alleged marriage between the plaintiff and the defendant is null and void because of their failure to file a health 'certificate with the Register of Deeds of Franklin County, as required by G.S. 51-14, is without merit. Failure to file a health certificate as required by law does not invalidate an otherwise legal marriage; but such failure to comply with the statute in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fogartie v. FogartieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Barwick v. . BarwickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  3. Cunningham v. CunninghamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Bumgarner v. BumgarnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. White v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Sayland Ex Rel. McLendon v. SaylandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Britt v. BrittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Harris v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API