Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Jackson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 8, 2004PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHudock, J.

¶ 1 En banc consideration was granted in this case in order to resolve the apparent inconsistency in our prior cases involving the treatment of inmate appeals from trial court dispositions that properly lie in the original jurisdiction of the Commonwealth Court. We affirm.

¶2 The relevant facts and procedural history may be summarized as follows: On October 14, 1999, Appellant pled nolo con-tendere to various charges involving the sexual abuse of his daughter. He was sentenced to an aggregate term of three and one-half to ten years of imprisonment, plus costs and restitution. No direct appeal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Danysh v. Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. DanyshSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Commonwealth v. FlemingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. ParellaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PriceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Wilkins v. MarsicoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Mohn, D. v. Bucks Co. Republican CommitteeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Gordon v. Philadelphia County Democratic Executive CommitteeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Mohn, D. v. Bucks Co. Republican CommitteeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API