Legal Opinion
Danysh v. Department of Corrections
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 24, 2004PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge LEAVITT.
Addressed to this Court’s original jurisdiction is a petition for review1 filed, pro se, by Kurt Michael Danysh against the Department of Corrections (Department), Cindy Walsavage, Inmate Accounting Assistant I, and Robert Shannon, Superintendent of the State Correctional Institution *262at Frackville (Respondents). Danysh seeks, inter alia, an order directing Respondents not to include the gifts in his inmate account when they calculate deductions therefrom and to return prior deductions made that Danysh asserts are unlawful. Respondents have filed preliminary objections…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Reynolds v. WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Higgins v. BeyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Bennett v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- James v. QuinlanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Bundy, K., Aplt v. WetzelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Hill v. Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth Department of Corrections v. TateCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Stodghill v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.