Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Danysh
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 17, 2003PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY KLEIN, J.:
¶ 1 This is an appeal from an order denying Kurt M. Danysh’s petition to stop deducting 20% of all income to his inmate account. Because the court of common pleas lacked subject matter jurisdiction, we vacate its order.
¶2 On October 9, 1997, Danysh pled guilty to third-degree murder and robbery. He was subsequently sentenced to a total of 22 to 60 years in prison and ordered to pay costs and fines. No restitution was ordered.
¶ 3 After he was incarcerated, on July 9, 2002, Danysh was advised that the Department of Corrections (“DOC”) was going to start deducting 20% of his…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LittleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Aronson v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. FlemingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. BakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- State Board of Dentistry v. WeltmanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PriceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Danysh v. Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. ParellaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- C.M. Bradley v. West Chester UniversityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.