Legal Opinion

Wilkins v. Marsico

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 21, 2006PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

GANTMAN, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Glue Wilkins, asks us to determine whether the trial court erred when it dismissed his complaint against the Dauphin County District Attorney, charging misconduct under 16 P.S. § 1405. We hold Appellant failed to establish probable cause for his misconduct action against the District Attorney accused. Accordingly, we affirm.

¶ 2 The trial court opinion sets forth the relevant facts and procedural history of this appeal as follows:

[Appellant] filed a civil complaint against Dauphin County District Attorney Edward M. Marsico, Jr., on April 26, 2004, charging…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. AdamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. RiveraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Commonwealth v. MarisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Duggan v. 807 Liberty Ave., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Jordan, E. v. PSUSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  2. Norman, D. v. Temple University HealthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. In the Interest of J.F.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Jordan, E. v. PSUSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  5. Norman, D. v. Temple University HealthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API