Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Parella
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 31, 2003PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY Judge SIMPSON.
Victor Parella, representing himself, appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Somerset County (trial court) that denied his Motion to Stop Act 84 1 Deductions (motion). Because the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, we vacate its order. 2
Parella is presently serving 10 to 20 years’ incarceration in a state correctional institution for murder in the third degree, to which he was sentenced in 1994. In addition to state confinement, Parella was sentenced to pay restitution of $18,963.53 and costs.
In November 2001, subsequent to the enactment of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LittleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Hall v. ACME MARKETS, INC.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. DanyshSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- George v. BeardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Bainbridge v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RushSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Spotz v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Com. v. Pierre, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Com. v. Sporish, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.